Skip to main content

Abid Alam petitions court over Bamugemereire’s land probe

Abid Alam petitions court over Bamugemereire’s land probe

Abid Alam, a prominent businessman, has petitioned the Constitutional court, questioning the conduct and some of the orders issued by the Commission of inquiry investigating land disputes which is headed by Jutsice Catherine Bamugemereire.
Through his lawyers Muwema and Company Advocates, the businessman claims the commission had overstepped its mandate when it issued some of the orders against him.
In particular, Alam questions the powers of the commission to order his arrest like it did on November 8 on allegation that he was obstructing its work.
Between September 11 and 14, the commission of Inquiry conducted public hearings during a visit to Mityana Farm Group enterprises, which is owned by Alam.
Allegations were made that in 2008, Alam working with the police evicted 600 families from a 12 square mile piece of land in Mubende.
Thereafter without listening to his side, Bamugemereire ordered police to arrest Alam an order the police effected on November 8.
On November 11, the commission issued a statement in which they accused Alam of “murder” and illegal eviction.
Now Alam’s lawyers want the court to declare the orders and actions of the commission against their client unlawful.
They say that the commission’s action of ordering their client’s arrest contravene articles 2 ,20,23 ,43 126 and 251 of the Constitution.
According to the petition, the lawyers say issuing an arrest order without laying a formal charge against Alam before a competent court of law is inconsistent with articles 2, 20, 28 and 43 of the Constitution.
Article 2 reads: “The rights and freedoms of the individual and groups enshrined in this chapter shall be respected, upheld and promoted by all organs and agencies of government and by all persons.”
The lawyers want the members of the commission to be individually held liable for all complaints.
They are: Bamugemereire, Robert Sebunya, Mary Oduka, Dr Rose Nakayi, Joyce Habasa, Frederick Ruhindi and George Bagonza.

The lawyers say that the act of the commission investigating land disputes between their client and other third parties and issuing orders amounts to “usurpation of the judicial powers of the courts of law.”
they pary that court issues a permanent injuection against the commsision, restarining it
They want court to grant damages for the physical inconveniences, mental agony, severe harm to his reputation and self esteem.
The petitioners also want court to grant damages to the second petitioner Mityana Farm Group Entreprises which started business  of maize production in 2008 to curb the looming hunger threats.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TO JAIL OR NOT TO JAIL A CIVIL DEBTOR

                                TO JAIL OR NOT TO JAIL A CIVIL DEBTOR In criminal justice punishment theory, people are sentenced to serve time in confinement or prison to achieve the deterrence of a repetition of a crime, rehabilitation of the offender or retribution by way paying for the crime committed against society through jail time. These are certainly beneficial tenets to the well-being of society and the reclamation of convicted criminals.  I am not sure if our civil justice redress system is designed to achieve the same objective for a civil offender who is committed to civil prison for failure to pay a civil debt. Uganda prisons sources indicate that by the end of last month, there were 340 civil prisoners in the 257 prison units across the country and this statistic is rising every year probably because of the growing poverty levels in the country. The recent jailing of NBS Simon...

FAKE NEWS IS HARMFUL BLISS

These days, our news ecosystem is playing host to an amplified form of harmful bliss called Fake news which is apparently as old as journalism itself. Fake news is bliss because more people are adept to consume and pleasure in it as it feeds their human sensuality which sometimes presents as momentary urges to give or receive a rose or rogue tinted version of a story. Many people are innocent consumers of fake news which is why it spreads faster than real news. Research has shown that the truth takes approximately six times longer than fake news to reach people thereby underlining the fatal attractiveness of fake news. It is difficult to find any major story or event that can resist the drive    or manipulation of a lethal dose of false information or news even when there is no clear legal definition in Uganda, of what fake news is or is not. I believe this obtains courtesy of an often subjective test of some fake news which has also stained supposedly official...

BRINGING MORE UNDERSTANDING TO THE COUNTERFEIT QUESTION

When we planned for the First Parliament Expo on Counterfeits which was held at the Members Lounge of the Parliament of Uganda on the 26 th April, 2017, nothing fully prepared us for the issues which we eventually met at the Expo. You could tell from some speeches and murmurs at the Expo that there was considerable difficulty in distinguishing a counterfeit from a substandard good. Many thought that the fight against counterfeits was disguised as an effort to protect interests of multinational corporations only and discourage local innovators . Others needed to be reminded that counterfeiting of a trademark was an offence under both International and Local Laws. At ACN, we understand that bridging the knowledge gaps between different stakeholders who affect and are affected by counterfeits is essential in the fight against counterfeits. This article is another step in helping stakeholders gain more understanding in the counterfeit debate . In simple terms, a Counterfei...